California state regulators put Silicon Valley Bank (SIVB) into receivership under care of the FDIC. The bank was the 16th largest US bank,as can be seen in the chart below, and its failure is the second largest in history.
The bank’s failure caused the market to fear contagion; several market-based risk indicators spiked this week.
Market Review: Stocks give back gains
Stocks followed up last week’s loss with more losses. The S&P 500 had its worst week since September 2022. US Stocks have given back much of this year’s gains.
The S&P 500 lost 4.5% for the week and holds on to a meager 0.9% gain for the year. The banking sector led to the downside this week as the KBW bank index lost 15.7% and is down 8% for the year. International stocks avoided the worst of the financials-driven losses; developed markets lost 0.2% and emerging markets lost 2%.
High grade bonds were flat, but high yield sold off a bit due to heightened recession fears.
Outlook: Signs of instability?
Concerns over market stability have taken hold. We would point out a couple of reassuring facts:
SIVB is, primarily, a commercial bank whose customers are concentrated in early-stage venture-backed technology companies. Their problems are not a broad representation of economic difficulty, but of cash flow struggles in venture capital, where funding has dried up.
The FDIC stepped in quickly to take control of the situation and will be working alongside the Fed to avoid market impact.
Banks were suffering as higher interest rates hurt the value of their portfolios, and customers in the technology and crypto world were pulling money amid slumping business conditions. SIVB customer outflows fed on themselves resulting in a run on deposits that is not likely to spread to the broad banking system.
While the market is likely to remain volatile, we urge investors to remain disciplined. In all likelihood the market will absorb this blow to psychology, rewarding investors who stay the course.
This material is intended to be educational in nature, and not as a recommendation of any particular strategy, approach, product or concept for any particular advisor or client. These materials are not intended as any form of substitute for individualized investment advice. The discussion is general in nature, and therefore not intended to recommend or endorse any asset class, security, or technical aspect of any security for the purpose of allowing a reader to use the approach on their own. Before participating in any investment program or making any investment, clients as well as all other readers are encouraged to consult with their own professional advisers, including investment advisers and tax advisors. OneAscent can assist in determining a suitable investment approach for a given individual, which may or may not closely resemble the strategies outlined herein.